At first glance, the “count the squares” puzzle seems almost insultingly simple. You look at an image — usually a square subdivided into smaller squares — and the task is straightforward: how many squares are there in total?
Many people respond in seconds. “Six,” someone says. “Nine,” another adds confidently. A few, more meticulous ones pause, stare longer, and then say “Sixteen!” or “Thirty!” depending on the grid.
The challenge looks like child’s play. But psychologists have noticed something fascinating: your approach to the puzzle may say far more about your mind than your math.
Because this little test — deceptively harmless and endlessly shareable — taps into deep psychological patterns: overconfidence, perception bias, attention to detail, and even narcissistic tendencies.
In a world where everyone believes they’re “right,” this puzzle quietly exposes how we think we think.
Let’s unpack what this viral illusion really tells us about the human mind — and why so many of us rush to answer it without realizing we’re looking at a psychological mirror.
1. The Puzzle That Started It All
The “count the squares” illusion has been circulating online for years. It appears on Facebook, TikTok, and Instagram, usually accompanied by captions like:
“Only geniuses can find all the squares!”
“99% get it wrong — can you?”
“Your answer says something about your personality!”
Typically, the image is a simple grid — a square divided by lines into smaller sections. Sometimes it’s a 4×4 box; sometimes it includes overlapping shapes or diagonal squares. The question remains constant: “How many squares do you see?”
At first, your brain interprets the image instantly — that’s what the visual system is designed to do. But the trap lies in that very speed. When we see something familiar (a grid, a box), we often stop looking.
That pause — or lack of it — is where personality differences emerge.
2. The Narcissism Connection: Why Quick Answers Reveal Overconfidence
Psychologists studying narcissism define one of its core features as overconfidence combined with low self-reflection. Narcissists often believe they’re right — even in the face of contradictory evidence.
In the context of this puzzle, that manifests in a simple way: a person gives a quick answer, assumes it’s correct, and feels no need to double-check.
They might even dismiss others who suggest different answers, thinking: “They must have miscounted.”
This small behavioral pattern reflects something bigger. According to cognitive psychology, overconfidence is one of the most common biases among humans — but it’s especially pronounced among narcissistic individuals.
Overconfidence bias in action
The human brain loves certainty. It gives a sense of control. Studies have shown that people consistently overestimate their knowledge or performance, even in fields they barely understand — from driving skills to logic puzzles.
When someone sees the “count the squares” test, the overconfident mind reacts almost instinctively: “I can solve this instantly.”
This immediate certainty provides a burst of dopamine — the brain’s reward chemical. The person feels intelligent, capable, and validated. That’s why people love these challenges on social media: they provide tiny hits of ego satisfaction.
The irony, of course, is that the test’s true purpose isn’t mathematical accuracy — it’s psychological exposure.
3. The Hidden Squares and the Limits of Perception
To understand how this test works on a cognitive level, let’s get a little nerdy.
When you look at a grid, your brain tries to organize visual information using Gestalt principles — the psychological rules that help us perceive patterns.
The most relevant ones here are:
- Proximity: We group nearby shapes together.
- Closure: We fill in missing parts of a shape mentally.
- Continuity: We follow lines and edges naturally.
So when you see a grid, your brain immediately identifies the smallest units — the obvious squares — and then tends to stop there. That’s why many people undercount.
They see, say, 9 small squares and feel confident. But they fail to notice the 4 medium squares (each made of 4 small ones) and the single large outer square that holds everything.
Suddenly, their confident “9” becomes a wrong answer.
The difference between “seeing” and perceiving fully lies in the ability to re-examine your assumptions.
And that’s the essence of self-awareness — something narcissism notoriously lacks.
4. The Psychology of Slowing Down
Now, consider another type of person: someone who doesn’t rush.
They squint at the image, trace each line, and re-evaluate. They might even redraw the grid on paper.
At first, they seem slower. But in reality, they’re cognitively flexible — willing to question their first impression.
Psychologists call this metacognition: thinking about one’s own thinking. It’s the mental act of stepping outside your immediate perception and asking, “Could I be wrong?”
This mental habit correlates with humility, open-mindedness, and analytical reasoning — traits opposite to narcissism.
In short: how you approach a puzzle like this reflects not your IQ, but your EQ — your emotional intelligence and self-awareness.
5. The “Counting Squares” as a Metaphor for Life
This puzzle’s deeper charm lies in how it mirrors life decisions.
Most of us move through daily experiences just like we look at the square grid — fast, reactive, confident in what we think we see. We jump to conclusions, label people quickly, trust our perceptions without question.
Only later do we realize we missed important details — the hidden “squares” of context, nuance, or truth.
In relationships, this can mean misjudging someone’s intentions. In business, it can mean ignoring fine details. In personal growth, it can mean refusing to see our own blind spots.
Every uncounted square is a metaphor for an unexamined truth.
6. Why Narcissists Hate Being Wrong
Let’s look closer at the emotional mechanics behind narcissism.
Narcissistic personalities are not just self-centered — they’re fragilely self-centered. Their confidence depends on maintaining the illusion of perfection.
To admit a mistake — even in something trivial like a puzzle — threatens that self-image. That’s why narcissistic individuals often defend their wrong answers aggressively.
Psychologists call this cognitive dissonance reduction: when reality challenges our beliefs, we adjust our perception of reality instead of our belief.
For example:
- A humble person might say, “Oh, I missed a few squares — interesting!”
- A narcissist might say, “That puzzle is stupid, it’s drawn wrong.”
One accepts the correction; the other rejects the reality.
The real puzzle, then, isn’t visual — it’s psychological: Can you stand to be wrong?
7. Counting the Actual Squares (and Why It’s Harder Than You Think)
Let’s take a common example — a 4×4 grid (the most viral one online).
- 1×1 squares: 16
- 2×2 squares: 9
- 3×3 squares: 4
- 4×4 squares: 1
Total = 30 squares.
Seems easy enough. But throw in diagonal lines, overlapping squares, or irregular arrangements — and suddenly people miss entire groups of hidden shapes.
Some advanced versions include 40 or 50 total squares, depending on interpretation.
The trick? You have to slow down, apply methodical reasoning, and accept uncertainty.
That’s not how narcissistic cognition operates — narcissists are cognitive sprinters. They move fast, seek validation, and avoid ambiguity.
Humility, on the other hand, is cognitive endurance — staying long enough in discomfort to reach clarity.
8. The Overconfidence Effect: A Universal Human Bias
Before we villainize narcissists too much, let’s be fair: overconfidence isn’t just a narcissistic flaw — it’s a human one.
Research in behavioral psychology shows that people routinely overestimate their knowledge. In the classic Dunning–Kruger effect, the least competent individuals tend to rate themselves as highly skilled, while experts underestimate their abilities.
This illusion of competence is comforting. It helps us function in a complex world without constantly doubting ourselves. But it also blinds us.
When faced with the “count the squares” test, the Dunning–Kruger curve plays out in miniature:
- The least observant guess instantly.
- The moderately observant hesitate and second-guess.
- The most observant question the entire structure, trying multiple angles before concluding.
Ironically, the smartest minds often sound least confident — because they know what they don’t know.
9. Why People Love Sharing These Puzzles
On social media, the appeal of such puzzles goes beyond curiosity — it’s about identity.
When someone posts “Only geniuses can find all the squares,” they’re not just testing intelligence; they’re inviting self-comparison.
People rush to comment their answers for two reasons:
- Validation — to prove they’re part of the “smart” minority.
- Curiosity — to see if others agree, which reassures them their perception is correct.
This cycle feeds both ego and community — a paradox that reflects our digital age’s social narcissism. We want to stand out and belong simultaneously.
The puzzle, therefore, becomes less about geometry and more about status.
10. The Mirror Test for the Modern Mind
Every visual illusion holds a hidden psychological mirror. In this one, the mirror reflects how comfortable we are with uncertainty.
Do we rush to answers because silence is uncomfortable?
Do we resist correction because being wrong feels like weakness?
Do we feel smarter for spotting something others missed?
Each response uncovers a layer of self-awareness — or lack thereof.
The deeper truth: humility sharpens intelligence; narcissism dulls it.
The humble mind keeps counting. The narcissistic one stops early.
11. The Cognitive Layers of Self-Perception
Let’s map how this plays out neurologically.
When you first see the image, your visual cortex handles pattern recognition. Your parietal lobe interprets spatial relationships. But the real decision — how long to look, whether to double-check — comes from the prefrontal cortex, the brain’s reasoning center.
Narcissistic individuals often show reduced activation in areas related to empathy and reflection. That means their brains literally process feedback differently — making it harder for them to reconsider an answer.
This biological insight reinforces why narcissism isn’t just arrogance — it’s a neurological rigidity.
12. Lessons for Everyday Life
Click page 2 for more
